CHAPTER II

CHARACTERISTICS OF INCIDENTS OF TARGETED SCHOOL VIOLENCE

The Safe School Initiative found that targeted school violence is not a new or recent phenomenon.  The earliest case that researchers were able to identify occurred in 1974.  In that incident, a student brought guns and homemade bombs to his school; set off the fire alarm; and shot at emergency and custodial personnel who responded to the alarm.

The Safe School Initiative identified 37 incidents involving 41 attackers that met the study definition of targeted school violence and occurred between 1974 and the end of the 2000 school year.[14]  These incidents took place in 26 states, with more than one incident occurring in Arkansas, California, Kentucky, Missouri and Tennessee.[15]

Analysis of the study findings identified the following characteristics of incidents of targeted school violence:

Target and Victim Characteristics

Perpetrators of incidents of targeted school violence chose a range of targets for their attacks, including fellow students, faculty and staff, and the school itself.  These incidents were usually planned in advance and for most part included intent to harm a specific, pre-selected target, whether or not the attacker’s execution of the incident, in fact, resulted in harm to the target.

Target and victim characteristics identified by the Safe School Initiative were:


[14] See Appendix A for a list of the dates of the incidents of targeted school violence examined by the Safe School Initiative.
[15] See Appendix B for a list of the locations of the incidents of targeted school violence studied under the Safe School Initiative.
[16] “N” refers to the number of attackers that corresponds to the reported percentage.  Unless indicated otherwise, when the finding pertains to total attackers all N’s are out of a total of 41.  When the finding pertains to total incidents (i.e., school-based attacks) all N’s are out of a total of 37 incidents.
[17] While all the attackers in this study were boys, it would be misleading to read the findings of this study as suggesting that a girl could not or would not carry out a school-based attack.  For example, an incident occurred after the completion of this study in which a girl shot her classmate at a parochial school in Williamsport, Pa.  In addition, a well-publicized school shooting that occurred in San Diego, Calif., in 1976 was carried out by a woman.  The San Diego incident was not included in this study because the attacker was not a current or former student of the school where she conducted her attack, but, rather, lived across the street from the school. 
[18] These percentages include all weapons used (i.e., discharged) in the attack, and therefore total more than 100 percent.
[19] For the purposes of this study, “grievance” was defined as “a belief that some other person or organization is directly or indirectly responsible for injury or harm to self and/or someone whom the subject cares about.”

linebar
Return to the Final Report and Findings of the Safe School Initiative Contents Page